Asasinarea a sute de copii în Gaza - Uniunea Europeană e complice

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Sub ochii noştri, plini cum sunt de praful pus pe sub pleoape de minciunile televiziunilor, sute de copii mor, iar şi iară, sub bombele israeliene. Când nu mor, devin orfani cu miile. Aiasta nu se mai poate ! Când mor, cu ei mor femei, bătrâni, invalizi, bolnavi, ziarişti, doctori, observatori, vizitatori, sau "doar" muncitori români ce se află pe acolo prin Gaza. Ei sunt asasinaţi în grup de israelieni, pentru că sunt acolo, sub motive calpe, cu "scuze" fariseice, transparente ca nesimţirea, ca fascismul sau ca rasismul însele. De fapt, ideologia criminalilor israelieni de război este talmudismul - acea falsificare a Torei prin idolatrie babiloniană, iar practica lor este sionismul - acel amestec de nazism cu comunism, plus un tip particular de rasism care urlă peste tot că doar "neamul ales" este uman, toţi ceilalţi fiind "vite" (goyim) - deci cu totul nedemne de trai uman.

Uite cum un neam întreg, al Gazei, acela din care se trage sfântul Dorotei al Gazei, e măcelărit de bombe americane, ars cu fosfor, injectat cu tungsten - un puternic carcinogen plasat de bombe "design", ca faimoasele "dime". Uite cum neamul palestinian este acum inoculat cu germeni din laboratoarele militare care aleg mai degrabă pe arabi pentru experimente Mengeleiene, uite cum n-au apă, curent, hrană, universitate, guvern ales, toate acestea doar pentru că s-au născut acolo... Uite cum "elita" militară a armatei de ocupaţie se "binoclează" prin lunete, ca să nimerească mai degrabă tineri sau chiar copii. Uite apoi cum militarii israelieni pun câini să mănânce cadavrele copiilor palestinieni, pentru ca familiile să nu mai poată să îngroape pe morţii lor cei mai fragezi. Uite cum palestinieni cu pieptul gol, de obicei tot copii, sunt folosiţi ca scut pentru "bravii" soldaţii israelieni din tancuri contra "nedemnilor" din Gaza, ce luptă aproape goi, după o lungă foame, cu AKM-uri de contrabandă. Totul se poate, vai, vedea, în lumea asta, în care doar cine bagă în ochii altora ţepe mai poate fi văzut...

Uite cum e distrus la foc mic un neam întreg, cu armament special ales, pervers, care depune anume uraniu pe lângă moarte, pentru a aduce moartea pe mai departe, mult timp de-acum înainte.

Iar Uniunea Europeană ce face ? "Pace" prin cuvinte noi - "banda Gaza", "cuartet-ul european", de parcă neologismele lor calpe ar fi mai importante ca sutele de copii palestinieni ce mor iar. Pe scurt, UE ne propune o nouă gargară cu mătrăgună pe gâtlejurile noastre la vale, câţi mai suntem azi cu gura larg deschisă... Mereu, pavlovian, suntem îndobitociţi de UE, an de an, tot mai mult, pentru a nu mai reacţiona la nedreptate. Tele-viziunile, cu "jocurile" lor video, cu pornografia, cu drogurile, cu orice alte decadenţe trec iute peste noi - deoarece orice mijloc din cele mai jalnice sau joase e bun pentru cei pe care Israel Shamir i-a numit "the masters of discourse". Suntem deci condiţionaţi ca vitele, prin magie cabalistă administrată de "idioţii utili" ai masoneriilor, pentru a pune "echitabil" în interiorul oricărei propoziţii referitoare la drepturile inalienabile sau incompresibile ale "omului" doar "statul" Israel. Cum poate însă uciderea copiilor din Gaza asigura sau "apăra" acel "stat" ?

Dar, de fapt, care "stat" ? Despre ce stat vorbim ? Un stat are frontiere. Un stat are drept internaţional. Un stat are prieteni. Acel "stat" sionist, implantat prin colonialism terorist are la baze doar minciuni, asasinate, sclavi, uneltiri, etc. Cine, realmente, se poate atunci numi amic al statului sionist, în timp ce acest "stat" pune în primejdie în mod samavolnic chiar pe evrei, folosindu-i pentru interesele guvernului mondial ? Ni s-a sugerat subliminal actul "justiţiar" al istoriei din actul fondator al "statului" sionist ca pe "soluţie" a problemei evreilor care nu au nici o ţară a lor, tocmai deoarece vor să le domine pe toate celelate. E drept că din punct de vedere istoric evreii au fost goniţi de peste tot, din orice stat, fără nici o excepţie. Dar tocmai de aceea, soluţia la problema identităţii lor este Hristos. Faptul că sionismul interzice, peste tot, chiar numai a vorbi despre Mântuitor, arată că sionismul se teme de Adevăr.

Vreţi dar să mai tăcem, ca să fim pe mai departe complici ? Mai înainte de a fi doctori, europeni, etc., noi suntem drept slăvitori. Noi nu putem deci alege moartea, sau "cultura ei", nici nedreptatea, nici fariseismul privirii cotite. Noi nu putem urî pe nimeni, iar de iubit iubim orice neam, inclusiv pe cel "ales". Acesta, o fi fost el "ales" de Domnul, care de altfel nu are de loc identitatea de neam a măsurii oamenilor, ci pe cea divină, dar el nu L-a ales pe Domnul. Neamul ales i-a ales (sau s-a temut doar de ei) dar de cules i-au cules doar pe farisei. Cei ce iubesc pe Hristos dintre evrei n-au loc în ¨statul¨ Israel. Ori cine sunt fariseii ? Sunt aceia ce vin din tribul măcelarilor care administrau arderile de tot din templul de la Ierusalim, apoi tot aceia din care se trag rabinii. Cine sunt deci rabinii ? Ei sunt cei care au ascuns Tora - Cuvântul Domnului, sub Talmud - cuvântul lor omenesc, pe care l-au declarat, în chip idolatru, drept "infailibil". Pe scurt rabinii slujesc nu pe Domnul, Dumnezeul, şi Mântuitorul nostru Iisus Hristos, ci pe ei înşişi, ca pe aleşii unui neam "ales", în chip idolatrizat. Acest neam "ales" deci, uite, nu-şi poate de fel potoli o sete de sânge ancestral-babiloneană, nerăbdătoare, foarte păgână, cea de care au scris atât de dumnezeieşte proorocii, şi mai ales vestitul Isaia la capul 59, cel pe care rabinii nu-l traduc...

Ce mai vedem ? Tocmai cei ce propun alegeri "democratice", Israelul cu America lui (US-rael-ul sau Isra-hell-ul), vin acum peste Gaza (Irak, Afghanistan, Serbia, Kosovo, Somalia, Sudan) cu bombe "hemocratice". Acestea sunt tipul de bombe aruncate prin vot "liber" peste cei ce trebuie astfel să priceapă "a alege util, iar nu just". Un ales, de altfel foarte just, prin vot popular al Gazei, controlat de observatori, anume primul ministru al Gazei muribunde, scrie :

UN NEAM E TERORIZAT DE ALT STAT APOI E UCIS, CHIAR ACUM, DAR ACEST ASASINAT COLECTIV NU MAI POATE FI UITAT DE NIMENI

By Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh - Gaza

I write this article to Western readers across the social and political spectrum as the Israeli war machine continues to massacre my people in Gaza. To date, almost 1,000 have been killed, nearly half of whom are women and children. Last week's bombing of the UNRWA (UN Relief Works Agency) school in the Jabalya refugee camp was one of the most despicable crimes imaginable, as hundreds of civilians had abandoned their homes and sought refuge with the international agency only to be mercilessly shelled and bombed by Israel. Forty-six children and women were killed in that heinous attack while scores were injured.

Evidently, Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005 did not end its occupation nor, as a result, its international obligations as an occupying power. It continued to control and dominate our borders by land, sea and air. Indeed the UN has confirmed that between 2005 and 2008, the Israeli army killed nearly 1,250 Palestinians in Gaza, including 222 children. For most of that period the border crossings have remained effectively closed, with only limited quantities of food, industrial fuel, animal feed and a few other essential items, allowed in.

Despite its frantic efforts to conceal it, the root cause of Israel's criminal war on Gaza is the elections of January 2006, which saw Hamas win by a substantial majority. What occurred next was that Israel alongside the United States and the European Union joined forces in an attempt to quash the democratic will of the Palestinian people. They set about reversing the decision first by obstructing the formation of a national unity government and then by making a living hell for the Palestinian people through economic strangulation. The abject failure of all these machinations finally led to this vicious war. Israel's objective is to silence all voices that express the will of the Palestinian; thereafter it would impose its own terms for a final settlement depriving us of our land, our right to Jerusalem as the rightful capital of our future state and the Palestinian refugees' right to return to their homes.

Ultimately, the comprehensive siege on Gaza, which manifestly violated the Fourth Geneva Convention, prohibited the most basic medical supplies to our hospitals. It disallowed the delivery of fuel and supply of electricity to our population. And on top of all of this inhumanity, it denied them food and the freedom of movement, even to seek treatment. This led to the avoidable death of hundreds of patients and the spiralling rise of malnutrition among our children.

Palestinians are appalled that the members of the European Union do not view this obscene siege as a form of aggression. Despite the overwhelming evidence, they shamelessly assert that Hamas brought this catastrophe upon the Palestinian people because it did not renew the truce. Yet we ask, did Israel honour the terms of the ceasefire mediated by Egypt in June? It did not. The agreement stipulated a lifting of the siege and an end to attacks in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Despite our full compliance, the Israelis persisted in murdering Palestinians in Gaza as well as the West Bank during what became known as the year of the Annapolis peace.

None of the atrocities committed against our schools, universities, mosques, ministries and civil infra-structure would deter us in the pursuit of our national rights. Undoubtedly, Israel could demolish every building in the Gaza Strip but it would never shatter our determination or steadfastness to live in dignity on our land. Surely, if the gathering of civilians in a building only to then bomb it or the use of phosphorous bombs and missiles are not war crimes, then what is? How many more international treaties and conventions must Zionist Israel breach before it is held accountable? There is not a capital in the world today where free and decent people are not outraged by this brutal oppression. Neither Palestine nor the world would be the same after these crimes.

There is only one way forward and no other. Our condition for a new ceasefire is clear and simple. Israel must end its criminal war and slaughter of our people, lift completely and unconditionally its illegal siege of the Gaza Strip, open all our border crossings and completely withdraw from Gaza. After this we would consider future options. Ultimately, the Palestinians are a people struggling for freedom from occupation and the establishment of an independent state with Jerusalem as its capital and the return of refugees to their villages from which they were expelled. Whatever the cost, the continuation of Israel's massacres will neither break our will nor our aspiration for freedom and independence.

- Ismail Haniyeh is the Prime Minister of the Palestinian government in Gaza. (Originally published in the British Independent – independent.co.uk, 2009, January 15)

Du blocus à l’assassinat collectif

Gaza : la responsabilité directe de la France et de l’Union Européenne

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Reiau aici mai jos un comunicat al Uniunii iudaice franceze pentru pace, din 27 decembrie 2008 :

L’armée israélienne a attaqué Gaza cette nuit avec des moyens militaires énormes. Le premier bilan fait état de plus de 200 morts, civils pour la plupart. Ce massacre était annoncé, envisagé et commenté ces derniers jours dans la presse israélienne, après la fin de la trêve respectée par le Hamas et rompue sans arrêt par l’armée israélienne. Ce crime a été rendu possible par l’impunité totale accordée à Israël depuis bientôt 9 ans et le soutien actif dont il bénéficie au sein de l’Union Européenne. Il est le résultat direct du « rehaussement de la coopération avec l’UE » imposée par la présidence française contre le vote de report du Parlement Européen.

Depuis maintenant des années, la bande de Gaza subit, avec le soutien complice de l’Union Européenne, un siège criminel qui viole délibérément toutes les lois internationales : un million et demi de civils sont prisonniers de l’armée israélienne et privés de tout : de nourriture, de carburant, d’électricité, de médicaments, de matériel scolaire … Moins d’un dixième des camions nécessaires au ravitaillement normal de la population parviennent à passer. L’aéroport et le port ont été détruits avant même d’avoir jamais pu fonctionner. Il est interdit de pêcher. Seuls quelques bateaux affrétés par des militants ont pu forcer le blocus. La population subit une « punition » collective impitoyable pour avoir « mal » voté. La communauté internationale laisse faire, voire encourage ce siège. L’occupant a expulsé Robert Falk, le rapporteur spécial sur la situation des droits de l’homme de l’ONU.

Il n’y a aucun statu quo possible, aucune perpétuation envisageable de ce siège impitoyable et criminel. Tout peuple assiégé a le droit de résister à l’oppression.
Aucune symétrie ne peut être établie avec les quelques kassams [missiles artisanales palestiniennes ] envoyés sur des villes du sud d'Israël. Il n’y aura pas de sécurité pour les Israéliens sans sécurité pour la population de Gaza. Les politiques européennes et américaines, depuis [ la conférence de paix qui a eue lieu à ] Anapolis, en évitant d’affronter la réalité de l’occupation, aboutissent à l’impasse attendue dont encore une fois le peuple palestinien paie tout le prix.

L’Union Juive Française pour la Paix dénonce le crime qui se déroule contre la population de Gaza. Elle appelle à manifester partout contre cette nouvelle agression. L’UJFP exige une réaction immédiate du gouvernement français, de la Communauté Européenne et de l’ONU pour faire cesser l’agression et pour mettre un terme au blocus de Gaza.

Ce barbarie ! Nu degeaba scria ÎPS Iustinian Chira despre popoarele barbare care au putut prelungi crimele pe care nici un popor botezat întru Hristos, cu etnogeneza limpede, nu le-ar putea admite. Dreptul internaţional nu poate fi ignorat la infinit, deoarece relaţiile internaţionale au la temelie raţiunea, umanitatea sau, într-un cuvânt, civilizaţia. Noi, în ortodoxie, nu putem admite reîntoarcerea la barbarie, deoarece am renega pe Domnul, Dumnezeul şi Mântuitorul nostru Iisus Hristos.

Identitatea Botezului

Singura identitate pentru "evreii anti-iudaici", cum scrie Israel Shamir...

Un text limpede al unui prieten al lui Israel Shamir, Mike Jones :

by Mike Jones
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Shamir was born in Novosibirsk in the Soviet Union in 1947. In 1968 he converted to Zionism and emigrated to Israel, where he joined the IDF and fought in the 1973 war. Stationed in Sinai during a fierce battle whose point he failed to understand, Shamir used that war as a symbol of what it meant to be a Jew. Being a Jew provided no help in understanding what Jews want from themselves and from bewildered mankind, “just as belonging to the elite troops does not help you with an understanding of the general staff” (Cabbala of Power, p. 12). When it comes to understanding the principle of unity among Jews, we are confronted with the opposite problem from the one we encountered with Catholics. Catholics have the principle of unity in Christ but no practical unity. Jews, on the other hand, have no principle of unity but, as Shamir says, like the locusts mentioned in the book of Proverbs, they “‘have no king, but they attack in formation’ and devastate whole countries as if by plan.”

In 1975, after studying law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Shamir moved to London where he worked for the BBC. From 1977 to 1979 he worked in radio in Japan. By this point, some ten years after he had left Russia, Shamir had become disillusioned with Zionism because of the way the Israeli government discriminated against non-Jews. From 1989 to 1993 Shamir returned to Russia where he worked as the Moscow correspondent for Ha’aretz. In 1993 he returned to Israel and settled in Jaffa, where he lives today.

At some point during the middle of the first decade of the 21st century, Shamir became a presence on the Internet and at around the same time he became a Christian. The connection between the two events was more than coincidence because, as Shamir himself put it, getting baptized by the Palestinian priest, Archbishop Theodosius Attalla Hanna “helped me sort out the question of identity.”

If there were ever a sign of contradiction for the age of irenic interreligious dialogue inaugurated by the Second Vatican Council, it is Israel Shamir. Shamir’s conversion to Christianity was a sign that the repressed had returned just in time to save the Church from total apostasy on the Jewish question. Shamir, the Jewish convert, saw Jews not as our “elder brothers” but as St. Paul saw them, which is to say, as “the enemy of mankind.” In accepting baptism, Shamir joined a long line of “Jews by birth who denounced the Judaic cult of Death and accepted the Living Christ.” For Shamir, the crucial “sieve” which separated good from evil in the great struggle of his day was the “relationship to the Palestinian suffering”; “whoever disregarded it followed Antichrist; whoever denounced it began his way to Christ.”

Like St. Paul, Shamir has become a latter day apostle to the Gentiles and a reproach to all those who would ignore the warning of the Gospels and urge upon Christians a quasi-Masonic brotherhood with their enemies which leads to their mental evisceration and moral ruin. “The point,” as Shamir says, is not pointless dialogue of the sort that is in reality nothing more that a covert form of cultural warfare, “The point is to liberate Jews from Jewishness, which is the enemy of mankind.”

Like Nicholas Donin and Joseph Pfefferkorn before him, Shamir is Lazarus returned from the realm of the dead. In addition to being reborn out of the Judaic culture of death, Shamir rose from the realm of what everyone had presumed was a dead idea, namely, that Jews need to accept Christ as their savior. Shamir was “granted the grace of Christ” and therefore “reborn in His glory.” He has come back to life to tell us all that he is “daily grateful to Christ who saved me from the Judaic paranoia of hating and being hated and brought me into the world of loving and being loved” and that “every Jew who has come to Christ by the way of rejecting the Judaic ideas, by upholding love for the nations, is a portent of Salvation” (Cabbala, p. 310). Like Nicholas Donin and Joseph Pfefferkorn before him, Shamir did not come back from the dead to become Eugene Fisher’s successor at the USCC. Shamir came back from the dead on fire with zeal to liberate Jews from the bondage of Judaism.

To do that, Shamir must first explain what it means to be a Jew:

a Jew must first understand himself and war against himself. Only steady resolution, united to the highest self-respect, can free the Jew from Jewishness. Therefore the Jewish question can only be solved individually; every Jew must try to solve it in his proper person”—by discovering God’s presence in the world, that is Christ (p. 19).

Like Joseph Pfefferkorn, Shamir has had to deal with the polite racism of the Left which associates Jews with some ineradicable racial destiny. Like Joseph Pfefferkorn, whom the humanist elite, including Erasmus, referred to as a “tauf Jud,” a baptized Jew, Shamir has been described as “an ethnic Jew who defines himself as a Christian.” Liberal Swedish journalists are a lot like Adolf Hitler in Shamir’s mind because they think “‘once a Jew, always a Jew’; baptism notwithstanding, Shamir can only ‘define himself as’ a Christian.”

Jews collaborate in the promotion of this sort of racism because it keeps Jews in line. Instead of distinguishing between racism, which is bad, and anti-Judaic principles, which are required of every Christian, Jews try to portray the anti-Judaism that is part and parcel of Christianity as a form of racism. Jews, in other words, manipulate the term “anti-Semitism” for their own political advantage:

Anti-Judaic thought is part of the foundation of Christianity and Communism, to mention just two of the most important ideologies. Jews try to present the anti-Judaic line as racism. Though anti-Judaic thought has existed for hundreds of years, Jews insist on using the name of “anti-Semitism,” a rather short lived racial theory of the 19th century. For the anti-Semite, a Jew has inherent and unchangeable inborn qualities, while anti-Jewish thought analyses and fights Judaic tendency.

Instead of admitting that there is something wrong with being Jewish because the Jewish rejection of Logos disposes Jews to act in a way that antagonizes everyone they come in contact with, the Jews fall back on outdated theories of racism as a way of exculpating bad behavior. “It is because of what we are, not of what we do,” a slogan recently appropriated by President Bush, has become the mantra that excuses bad behavior and hides from Jews the core of their essentially negative identity and why they have faced antagonism among every group they have lived with throughout history.

There has never been a “paradisus Iudeorum” that has not ended in catastrophe for the Jews, and there has never been a catastrophe that has not been rationalized into one more link in a long chain of anti-Semitism by Jewish apologists determined to ignore the toxic effect of Jewish behavior on native populations and the inevitable reaction which it brings forth from them. Shamir cites the Jewish delight in using terms like “hook-nosed” as “a clear sign of the Jewish effort to turn anti-Zionist or anti-Judaic polemics into racist ones.” Racism is the simplest way to deflect attention from the source of the problem. Hence, the Jewish delight in discovering racism even where none exists. “Anti-Semitism,” Shamir points out, “was a short-lived racial theory of late 19th century claiming that . . . Jews are what they are; that they possess some racial qualities making them an inherent enemy of the Nordic race, like a wolf is an enemy of a rabbit.” This was never the position of the Church, which always maintained that the problem between Jews and Gentiles was religious in nature and solved by conversion. If there were ever a time when “hatred of Jews for what they are” was an issue, Shamir claims “such a phenomenon vanished completely. There are people who object to policies of Jews, but none to Jews per se.” The fact that Jews insist on obscuring the issue means that only Christians can frame the issue properly, and yet this is precisely what the Church has refused to do for the past 40 some years. Making the proper distinctions would pave the way for the solution to the problem, but this is precisely what Jews want to avoid, because it would mean the end of their hegemony over discourse. If Mel Gibson had had the benefit of understanding the distinctions which Shamir made, he could have shrugged off the charges of anti-Semitism by claiming what every Christian should be able to claim, namely, “I am anti-Judaic, just like Christ.”

Shamir’s conversion is clearly a scandal and a reproach to the entire era of post-Vatican II inter-religious dialogue. Shamir became a Christian during the period when the Catholic Church had all but officially called for a moratorium on Jewish conversion. One of the most painful events in the time of his life surrounding his conversion came in 2002, when the bishops of the United States issued their document “Reflections on Covenant,” which in effect said that Jews did not have to accept Christ in order to be saved. Shamir described “Reflections” as “an act of cruelty to the Jews” which came perilously close to the denial of Christ and apostasy of the Church that the faithful would experience in the last days. According to Shamir,

The Catholic Church after Vatican II accepted the unacceptable demands of the Jews and agreed to the conditions once rejected by St. Paul. They agreed to the idea of two covenants, as if the Old Covenant is not the same as the New Covenant. Thus they came to the weird idea of two Chosen Peoples—Israel of the flesh and the Church. The Orthodox Church is still safe from this dangerous heresy. Only the Orthodox Church can offer true salvation to the Jews escaping their supremacist creed. And now, when thousands of Jews try to come to Christ, the Orthodox Church of Jerusalem does not make a sufficient effort to bring them in.

Whenever the forces of darkness prepare a new attack on mankind, they use their considerable artillery to shut up the potential resistance forces, starting with their new enemy, the Church. . . . This was the practice of the Third Reich as well: before starting the war, they began their campaign of “priests as sex fiends” to force the church’s silence. Now this is the turn of the Fourth Reich: the Church was against the war in Iraq; the Church was steadfast in her defense of Palestine, the Church is certainly against the impending attack on Iran, so she has to be put on defense. The same people who control the US media call for war with Iran, and they are behind this campaign against the Church.

The Jewish-American empire sees the Church as its main adversary, according to Shamir, because it is in reality a competing church, “the church of darkness.”

(...)

Christianity is the denial of Jewish superiority. Whoever believes or accepts Jewish superiority denies Christ for He made us equal. The French Jewish filmmaker Claude Lanzmann, the creator of “Shoah,” said: if you believe in holocaust you can’t believe in Christ. We can rephrase the words of Lanzmann: belief in a special historical meaning of death of Jews is a sign of apostasy. . . . We believe that Christ suffered for us and came back to life. The Holocaust believers believe that the Jewish people suffered and came back by creating the Jewish state. In this competition, the Jews win: as opposed to Holocaust, you can deny Crucifixion and Resurrection, and your career won’t suffer a bit.

Belief in Jewish superiority, according to Shamir, is the official faith of the Pax Americana. Similarly, the Soviet Union eventually collapsed because it lacked an adequate theological foundation. This fatal flaw is echoed in the “neo-Jewish” American empire. “The Judaic paradigm has replaced apostolic Christianity, and now America is suffering “in the grip of a New World Order—featuring a dwindling middle class, a vast security apparatus, a growing social gap, and a general impoverishment of spirit. It is not the first time the Judaic paradigm has risen in this world; but, like its predecessors, it will inevitably collapse—this type of society lacks broad social support. This time the adepts have decided to ensure its survival by making their project global . . .this is the logic and pressure behind their reckless and desperate expansion.”

(...)

Shamir is the revenant in our day of famous Jewish converts like Joseph Pfefferkorn, Jews who woke up one day and realized that by being Jews they were working for the evil empire. Then as now there were Christians who hated the idea of Jewish conversion and were more comfortable with racial explanations that cut off the Jews from Christian society. The Dominicans of Cologne were not part of that group. The great question for Christians in our day is whether we are as acute as Shamir in discerning the signs of the times. In this respect, his conversion story is especially relevant for American Catholics, who are still asleep at the switch, drugged by bad politics, bad theology, and what seems like a congenital desire to appease their oppressors.

Dixit !

Între Alte Imperii...

Abcesul de fixaţie

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

„Iubesc acest popor bun, blând, omenos, pe spatele căruia diplomaţii croiesc charte şi resbele, zugrăvesc împărăţii despre cari lui nici prin gând nu-i trece...”

(Eminescu, ms 2257 fila 37)


De câteva sute bune de ani, noi românii am izbutit să supravieţuim între cele trei imperii ale vremilor care nu erau la rându-le, mai niciodată, sub cârma noastră.

Mereu veneau şi plecau prin "principate" ba turcul, ba rusul, ba austriacul, de făceau "legile" lor "noi", chipurile... nouă, dar împotriva celor pământeşti.

Aveam astfel printre noi puhoaie pestriţe, revărsate peste cei dintre noi "cu nas subţire" - aveam ba mehterbaşale cu ceaprazuri, ba moscali scapeţi biciuind la regulamentele lor "organice", ba valsuri fleandură din chezaro-crăime, să ne tot "alegem" între băşcălie, huzur sau Gemütlichkeituieli.

Nu erau nici ele, tutelele streine, ceva nou sub soare. De mult înainte Valahia gemea turcită, Moldova "se scăpa de mult bine" iar Ardealul... ardea. Noi mergeam fiecare cum puteam. Mergeam cu Dumnezeu înainte !

Inima în Dumnezeu, iar gândul la ţară... Zece mii de ani de istorie, cu arcul carpatic în suflete ca o coardă oţelită, şi cu vitejie cât cuprinde ! Astfel veneau toate puhoaiele, luau ce puteau, apoi fiind val, ca valul treceau. Scara timpului nostru neavând comună măsură cu acelea ale migratorilor, Domnul dădea să ne păstrăm locul.

Azi însă sunt alte imperii, din care văd mai limpede două :

Unul e cel dinlăuntru. Acesta a fost vârât cu sila, cu viclenie, prin televizoare, prin tăvălugul dolarilor, prin licori ademenitoare. Ca un cancer, acest imperiu dinăuntru ne sufocă ţesăturile fireşti ale trupului neamului, ne fură sufletele, ne scade fertilitatea. Cu acesta e greu de luptat, dar nu imposibil, deoarece fiecare suntem şi altceva decât trup.

Cellalt este cel "lumesc" - imperiul mondial. Ca o menghină ce se strânge dinafară, el striveşte trupul neamurilor, le fură pământul, cu tot ce se află în măruntaiele lui. Ciudat, chiar atât de ascuns cum se dă, mare sau rotund, acesta din urmă ia forme geografice foarte limpezi, chiar de sunt încă peticite...

Acest imperiu mondial a ajuns acum, tot din trei părţi, să ne ceară pământ şi apă. Dinspre turcime se aude cântul mierlei, în câmpia însângerată în care a fost oprită semiluna de către armata mică dar întreagă a ortodoxiei. Dinspre stepe se aude cum vine vuiet de vânt de dincolo de Nistru. Iar de la apus, unde nu mai sunt austrieci, ci ungurime, se vântură armele sunătoare ale băneturilor, cu care se cumpără Ardealul.

Cum trupul sfârtecat al Serbiei a ajuns abcesul de fixaţie al scursurilor purulente din lumea celor laşi de pretutindeni, tot astfel carnea vecină se poate un timp păstra neinfectată.

"Conducerea" noului "stat" de pe Câmpia Mierlei, care e, chipurile, "independent", e la fel de ilegală ca secesiunea. Nu e nici un drept între neamuri care s-o accepte. Este o mafie ca toate celelalte, acum implantată în Metohia, unde erau odinioară mănăstiri ortodoxe. Nu e nici măcar o burghezie compreadoră, la fel de vândută ca tot ceea ce vinde.

E mafie. Thaci este cumnatul celui mai renumit traficant de carne vie pentru Occident, prin filierele helvete. Statul naţional mafiot este astfel ultima făcătură a "statului" zis "modern" rebranded ca "liber" sau "independent", doar ca să vândă tot ce se mai poate (minereuri, patrimoniu, terenuri, droguri, carne vie) fără stinghereli din partea popoarelor locului. Irak, Afganistan sau "Kosova" sunt doar primele exemple ale "noii ordini" a imperiului mondial.

Victimele uneltelilor sunt la fel de pierdute - de exemplu, acum, albanezii suferă la fel ca sârbii. Dar tehnica aceasta de supravieţuire este o medicină slabă. Doar uneltitorii se risipesc prin iluzia "echilibrului" bazat pe Realpolitik.

Românii au trăit întotdeauna printre catastrofe, iar nu prin catastrofe. Un neam generos ? Poate ! Poate mai degrab' pentru că pe vremuri românii trăgeau rădăcini direct din cer, iar strămoşii făceau un fel de gură de rai din locul lor terestru. Dar din dar...

În fine, pentru cine mai avea o iluzie despre ce ni se pregăteşte, iat-o pe Sara Flounders scriind Washington gets a new colony in the Balkans :

In evaluating the recent “declaration of independence” by Kosovo, a province of Serbia, and its immediate recognition as a state by the U.S., Germany, Britain and France, it is important to know three things :

First, Kosovo is not gaining independence or even minimal self-government. It will be run by an appointed High Representative and bodies appointed by the U.S., European Union and NATO. An old-style colonial viceroy and imperialist administrators will have control over foreign and domestic policy. U.S. imperialism has merely consolidated its direct control of a totally dependent colony in the heart of the Balkans.

Second, Washington’s immediate recognition of Kosovo confirms once again that U.S. imperialism will break any and every treaty or international agreement it has ever signed, including agreements it drafted and imposed by force and violence on others.

The recognition of Kosovo is in direct violation of such law—specifically U.N. Security Council Resolution 1244, which the leaders of Yugoslavia were forced to sign to end the 78 days of NATO bombing of their country in 1999. Even this imposed agreement affirmed the “commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity” of Serbia, a republic of Yugoslavia.

This week’s illegal recognition of Kosovo was condemned by Serbia, Russia, China and Spain.

Thirdly, U.S. imperialist domination does not benefit the occupied people. Kosovo after nine years of direct NATO military occupation has a staggering 60 percent unemployment rate. It has become a center of the international drug trade and of prostitution rings in Europe.

The once humming mines, mills, smelters, refining centers and railroads of this small resource-rich industrial area all sit silent. The resources of Kosovo under NATO occupation were forcibly privatized and sold to giant Western multinational corporations. Now almost the only employment is working for the U.S./NATO army of occupation or U.N. agencies.

The only major construction in Kosovo is of Camp Bondsteel, the largest U.S. base built in Europe in a generation. Halliburton, of course, got the contract. Camp Bondsteel guards the strategic oil and transportation lines of the entire region.

Over 250,000 Serbian, Romani and other nationalities have been driven out of this Serbian province since it came under U.S./NATO control. Almost a quarter of the Albanian population has been forced to leave in order to find work...

Sara ştie ce scrie. A fost acolo. A primit în cap bombele americanilor în 1999. E directoarea unui organism (International Action Center ) care a documentat preferinţele NATO pentru atacarea civililor sârbi, cei care au suferit cel mai mult din "politica" americanilor. De ce scriu de americani ? Ei sunt doar jandarmii orbi ai şchiopilor ce i-au încălecat deja, de-i prăvălesc acum cu totul şi pe ei...

Dar atât despre unelteli. Grija noastră să fie să ne rugăm de-adevărat, nu să dezlegăm ce nu-i de dezlegat. Eminescu a scris limpede că ne iubeşte pentru că nici prin cap nu ne trece ce unelteli se fac pe socoteala noastră...

On Freedom of Speech

Le mythe postmoderne de l'indépendance des médias

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

À New York, lors d'un banquet, le 25 septembre 1880, le célèbre journaliste John Swinton se fâche quand on propose un toast à la liberté de la presse.

« Il n'existe pas, à ce jour, en Amérique, de presse libre et indépendante. Vous le savez aussi bien que moi. Pas un seul parmi vous n'ose écrire ses opinions honnêtes et vous savez très bien que si vous le faites, elles ne seront pas publiées. On me paye un salaire pour que je ne publie pas mes opinions et nous savons tous que si nous nous aventurions à le faire, nous nous retrouverions à la rue illico. Le travail du journaliste est la destruction de la vérité, le mensonge patent, la perversion des faits et la manipulation de l'opinion au service des Puissances de l'Argent. Nous sommes les outils obéissants des Puissants et des Riches qui tirent les ficelles dans les coulisses. Nos talents, nos facultés et nos vies appartiennent à ces hommes. Nous sommes des prostituées de l'intellect. Tout cela, vous le savez aussi bien que moi ! »

(Il s'agit, faut-il s'étonner, encore, de 25 septembre 1880. En parlant la newspeak du "progrès" et de la "démocratie". Source: Labor's Untold Story, de Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, NY, 1955/1979.)

Soarta Imperiului

Când ai uitat de unde ai plecat...

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Soarta Imperiului s-a pecetluit. Despre aceasta, din nou scrie aici neobositul, talentatul Malic:

The Empire has blundered in the Balkans, and badly. Intoxicated with power and believing themselves able to change reality itself by force its rulers have stumbled into a trap of their own making. In 1999, Kosovo was made into a symbol of Imperial might; now it has become a symbol of Imperial weakness. By insisting on the impossible and rejecting reality, rulers of the Empire have wasted every pretense of authority. The Empire may have been bled dry in the sands of Iraq, but it will perish over some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.

Ce este Dreptul?

Cam tot ceea ce mai este (sau mai curând era) gramatica română?

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Article 19 of the UN Human Rights Charter explicitly states:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

Aceasta mi-aduce aminte:
Dreptul nu este ceva ce se acordă, ci tocmai ceea ce nimeni nu-ţi poate lua!

Tot ce se aude prin presă despre drepturi rămâne doar retoric. Nu există în realitate nimic similar cu a "cere dreptul". Această vociferare, clamare, folosită azi atât de des, inclusiv în urâtul cuvânt anglo-saxon claiming este un fals în acte publice. Chiar Diogene spunea Macedonului "nu-mi lua ce nu-mi poţi da!". Există o modă rea, un Zeitgeist pocit, ba chiar o invitaţie zilnică a necuratului in actul de a ne "cere" drepturile. Aceste uneltiri nu pot persista fără acea retorică falsă a "progresului", a "evoluţiei" sau a "diversităţii" mincinoase, care distrug ţesătura corpului social sau aceea mai fină a istoriei unui neam.

Dar nici o dezinformare nu poate sta în vre-o cumpănă oarecare cu demnitatea suverană a umanului, care nu are nici o măsură comună cu justiţia, ci cu Creatorul. Dreptul este. E drept a fi astfel! A "cere" dreptul transformă omul liber, suveran în mod natural pentru că aduce slavă unui singur Stăpân, în lacheu la fals stăpân. Veghea la hotară cere a nu lăsa dreptul suveran să decadă în negoţ cosmopolitan. Demnitatea umană este o minune pe care doar Domnul a creat-o! Doar Domnul nostru, Mântuitorul Hristos ne-a redat-o la Înviere! Iar numai Sfântul Duh poate veghea asupra demnei noastre origini dinainte de cădere.

Departe-văzător în Gaza

Dragul de Israel!

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Dintre creştinii din Ţara Sfântă - cei atât de prigoniţi de câtre sionişti - printre cei cu discursul cel mai articulat, chiar lucid, deşi strict politic, este Israel Shamir, dragul meu „departe-văzător”. Numele pe care le dă el lucrurilor sunt clare. Uneori ne miră, adesea vrem să-l ajutăm, dar mereu ne interesează. Scrie bine. Iată-l într-un fragment limpede din Întunecime dinspre Apus...

In the Holocaust dogma, Pope Pius surrendered the Jews to the Germans, affirming the eternal enmity of the Holocaustians to the Church. It does not matter that on a factual level, the accusations have been refuted many times over. Our tenacious enemy never gives up, never acknowledges his defeat, never accepts the facts unless they suit him.

Who is the enemy? Some people refer to the Israel Lobby with their great control over media. In the famed tract, they were called the Elders of Zion. Others call them Illuminati. I called them the Masters of Discourse, the operators of the integrated machine of public disinformation and indoctrination, from the Wall Street Journal to the Wikipedia. Thousands of networks, newspapers, journals, books, films and ideas are being united and guided by their invisible hand, while free thought still survives in the far reaches of the web. The fearsome AIPAC is just the visible tip of the iceberg, below which are miles and miles of solid ice: media lords, chief editors, their pundits – in short, the Masters of Discourse. Their power base is in the media, in their ability to create a false presentation of reality and mislead people. Recently John Pilger described it as The Invisible Government.

When the Masters of Discourse fought against Communism, they had a few faked 'facts' they were never tired of brushing up. They played with stupefying numbers: Communists killed thirty, no, fifty, no, sixty million, though the freely available demographic figures of the Soviet Union made it as miraculous as feeding of the multitudes by five loaves. They invented Soviet anti-Semitism, though Soviet government and security always had a lot of Jews in high places. They invented Soviet totalitarianism, though the Soviet people freely supported their government. Instead of the Holy Grail, they had Raul Wallenberg, who was supposed to have survived miraculously and to have been kept in some far-away jail. No research would ever move them to recognize their inventions for being what they were, namely, lies.

Now they want to destroy Iran and cripple Russia, for these lands did not forget God. They do fight against the Church, against every church, be it Communism or Islam or Orthodox Judaism, or their traditional enemy, the Apostolic Church, for every church defends its flock against their robbery and resists their dark drive for domination. The church affirms the primacy of spirit, and of the godlike nature of man; this is anathema to the Masters. On a deeper level, the Church is their main adversary, for they are a competing church of sorts, the church of darkness, and they will not suffer a competitor.

Dominant as they are, they are not omnipotent. We should not be afraid of them. There is no magic in their incantations. They have no divine powers behind them. They are impostors. They exploit the old myths of mankind, forgetting that nothing works without God. The Masters are twins to Zionists; the Zionists decided to arrange for Israel's return to the Promised Land as it was promised to their fathers. However, that return was to be done by God; while humans trying to do God's work are necessarily rebels.

Israel Shamir scrie minunat, de exemplu Florile Galileei. Israel Shamir este cenzurat, obligat a locui în Suedia, chiar fiind veteran al resbelului din 1967. Nu se pot afla pe YouTube video-uri cu Israel Shamir. De accea voi pune mai jos un film cu Neturei Karta, care spune ceea ce e drept despre Sionism:



One of the primary causes of modern day Anti-Semitism is the brutal occupation by Zionists of Palestine. There is today a growing number of people of the Jewish faith that recognize that Zionism is in fact counter to the fundamental tenets of the Torah, genuine Judaism and against the principles stated by the ancient Hebrew named Moses. La Voz de Aztlan joins our many Jewish friends who recognize this fact.

Lupi ciobăniţi sunt mincinoşi ciobani...

...Chiar dând iama în guzgani

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Un singur membru din parlamentul britanic - odinioară un exemplu de adunătură omenească - s-a opus măcelului sistematic care s-a numit "resbelul contra terorismului".

Acum, când milioane de victime irakiene se adaugă altor milioane de copii irakieni decedaţi în deceniul de foamete la care "comunitatea internaţională" a condamnat poporul irakian, acei lupi în piei de oaie ies din nou din bârloage. Tocmai aceia care au făţărnicit atât ideea de parlament, inventând "cauzele" agresiunii contra unui popor întreg, atacă pe acest om curajos.

Omul curajos este Gorgeous George, iar scrisoarea lui contra cenzurii la care este supus în acest parlament de operetă este un model. Iată-l :

Gorgeous George (George Galloway, MP): Fala parlamentului britanic, membru acolo de 20 de ani, acum singur cu turma tuturor pe urma lui...

Letter to Speaker Martin
19 July 2007

Dear Mr Speaker,

You will have seen, with I hope as much alarm as me, the editorial in yesterday’s Sun newspaper, which – in a challenge to Parliamentary privilege I suggest – calls on the government to curtail my rights as a Member of Parliament in the debate on Monday on the report of the Standards and Privileges Committee.

Whilst I have every reason to believe that you will not allow me to be gagged in any way in my detailed defence against what is, in their own words, a debate on an inquiry of “unprecedented length and complexity” I am less confident about the conduct of the government whips.

I am seeking your protection, Mr Speaker, from any attempt to censor me in the important speech I intend to make, which will be watched and read by many people in our own country and abroad.

I do hope I can count on it. For if I were to be so censored in a debate on my exclusion from the House, in which I have sat for 20 years and from which I have never been excluded for any reason before, this would not only heap an injustice upon an injustice, it would plunge Parliament into the ninth circle of disrepute, earning it contempt from large numbers of people who wish to hear what I have to say in response to this report.

In view of the importance of this matter I am making this letter public.

Yours sincerely,

George Galloway MP

Iar iese Diogene din butoi!

Regele e gol!

by Dr Dan Waniek, MD
Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved. Copyright Requests Here Please !

Se pare, dacă apocrifa e valabilă, că Diogene umbla cu lampa sa de noapte arzând ziua în amiaza mare spre ruşinea democraţiilor. Căuta, chipurile, cu tot dinadinsul, un om... Slavă Domnului că mai sunt la Muldova omini... Pentru că şi azi mai avem norocul de a citi scrieri lucide. Iată azi, în Imperial Poker, pe neobositul Nebojsa Malic :

As the Imperial project lumbers along, leaving death and destruction in its wake, a truly terrible realization is emerging. It's not that hundreds of millions of people still buy the Imperial propaganda at face value – though that number is dwindling steadily – it's that the Empire doesn't care of [what - n. n.] they do or not. After all, what did the American public do when it became obvious that there were no Iraqi WMDs and the entire casus belli was a fraud? What could it do? The Emperor simply gave them the political equivalent of "Yeah, so what?" and kept on trucking.

Almost two decades of "humanitarian interventions" and "nation-building" that followed the end of the Cold War have significantly lowered the bar of what passed for acceptable in international relations.

(...)

It is this sort of hubris – a misguided, delusional belief that it is so powerful it can make up its own rules, create its own reality, defy the laws of physics, politics and nature with mere whims – that is at the root of Empire's rapidly approaching downfall.


Because it does not control the rules of the game; it has merely bent them about as far as they can go. No amount of willpower or conceit will make a High Card beat a Royal Flush.

The Empire is holding when it needs to fold; walking straight into doom where it ought to cut losses and run. It isn't just a watch George W. Bush lost in Albania, but perhaps the last vestiges of his ability to discern what is real from what is in his mind.

Even the unwaveringly loyal mainstream media found last week's Albanian excursion a bit much. One AP report on Bush's visit included the following comment by a California professor: "You know things aren't going well when you have to go to Albania to have people take to the streets and cheer you."

The game is up.

Asta este ! Iar răspunsul dat de Diogene împăratului care zice cum poate da orice pe lume săracului (dar mai ales îi poate lua lumina soarelui) ar trebui să smerească orice singur-mărit :

"Nu-mi lua ce nu-mi poţi da!"